I read a very
interesting piece by activist Kimala Price called What is Reproductive Justice? : How Women of Color Activists Are
Redefining the Pro-Choice Paradigm.
I really liked her use of the term “reproductive justice” rather than
“reproductive rights” or “pro-choice” because she and the reproductive justice
movement believe that women of any class, race or ethnicity should have the
right to three things: the right to have an abortion, the right to have a
child, and the right to parent a child (Price, 43). Marginalized women are sometimes not being
given these three main rights, and there have been some smaller groups who have
tried to fight it and stand up for this cause; however, those women need a
bigger following and more support. The
problem with colored women joining the mainstream groups that fight for
reproductive rights of women is that they often begin to lose sight of their
own personal goals towards bettering the situations of people of their minority
races or classes because they get swept up into the “big picture” which always
seems to benefit the middle-class white women.
This is natural, when the cause is so broad we tend to cater to the
majority and forget about some of the reasons why we began to fight in the
first place, that is why building these more individualized activism groups
centered on women of color or women in poverty is important. Having each of
these groups focus on their individual struggles and needs can make a stronger
movement as a whole and give better chances to all women to receive
“reproductive justice”. The more that organizations like SisterSong can get women of color and even men of color on board
with their cause can help make such a bigger impact when they then team up with
other organizations who mainly just focus on women as a whole, it will help the
women of color get the same opportunities and choices that middle class white
women do when it comes to having children.
No comments:
Post a Comment